On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 10:36 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > Cool to see HTTP/2 coming down the pike. > > I see a new module for HTTP2 and while I realize that this is fresh code, > I'd like to talk about naming. > > I see types with the "H2" prefix, others with "Http2" and others with no > prefix. > > I find the module name "httpcore5-h2" and "H2" in general not great. > > How about "http2core5" and a "Http2" prefix where we need one? > > I know there is virtually no risk of confusing HTTP code with the H2 > database, but H2 does not say much to me. > > Thank you, > Gary >
Hi Gary Actually according to the protocol spec "h2" is the standard protocol identifier for HTTP/2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#section-3.1 I personally find "http2core5" terrible. I would rather have "httpcore5-http2" instead if "httpcore5-h2" is deemed confusing. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
