On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 10:36 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > Cool to see HTTP/2 coming down the pike. > > > > I see a new module for HTTP2 and while I realize that this is fresh code, > > I'd like to talk about naming. > > > > I see types with the "H2" prefix, others with "Http2" and others with no > > prefix. > > > > I find the module name "httpcore5-h2" and "H2" in general not great. > > > > How about "http2core5" and a "Http2" prefix where we need one? > > > > I know there is virtually no risk of confusing HTTP code with the H2 > > database, but H2 does not say much to me. > > > > Thank you, > > Gary > > > > Hi Gary > > Actually according to the protocol spec "h2" is the standard protocol > identifier for HTTP/2. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#section-3.1 > > I personally find "http2core5" terrible. I would rather have > "httpcore5-http2" instead if "httpcore5-h2" is deemed confusing. > I see, there is "h2" and "h2c"... well, I guess "httpcore5-h2" would work if the only thing in there is really just h2/h2c. Otherwise, "http2" is obvious and clear. Maybe "h2" will become better known as "oh, of course, this is HTTP/2" in the future? Pardon my newness to h2! :-) Gary > > Oleg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
