[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCORE-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16017030#comment-16017030 ]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCORE-469: -------------------------------------------- Hi Matt At some point of time I would like to try building a lock-less pool implementation (see HTTPCORE-390). We cannot use {{StampedLock}} for now. This might change later in the 5.0 release cycle though. If you could raise a PR at Github with changes switching to {{ReentrantReadWriteLock}} I'll happily merge them. I imagine it should just be a matter of changing {{ReentrantLock}} with {{ReentrantReadWriteLock}} but maybe there is more to it. Oleg > Use ReentrantReadWriteLock in AbstractConnPool > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HTTPCORE-469 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCORE-469 > Project: HttpComponents HttpCore > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: HttpCore > Reporter: Matt Nelson > Priority: Minor > > AbstractConnPool is currently using a {{ReentrantLock}} which has to lock for > read and write operations. Switching to {{ReentrantReadWriteLock}}[1] and > read locks for the stats/getters methods would reduce the possibility for > instrumentation[1] to cause contention. Another option would be > {{StampedLock}}[3] if the compile target is 1.8. > [1] > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantReadWriteLock.html > [2] > https://github.com/dropwizard/metrics/blob/v3.2.2/metrics-httpclient/src/main/java/com/codahale/metrics/httpclient/InstrumentedHttpClientConnectionManager.java#L63-L95 > [3] > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/locks/StampedLock.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org