On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 21:19 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: > ...
> > > > > Is Commons Pool an option? Or even the high-performance > > > > > Tomcat > > > > > JDBC > > > > > Pool > > > > > stripped for the JDBC part? It is little code compared to > > > > > Commons > > > > > Pool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is an option but what would exactly be the upside? On the > > > > downside > > > > we would likely lose the ability to support stateful > > > > connections > > > > that > > > > we presently have in 4.x and 5.x. > > > > > > Upside: we use well tested, existing ASF code. > > > > > > > Are you sure? > > Tomcat JDBC Pool has been shipped since 7.0 as a high perf > alternative > to Commons DBCP. > > But you want maybe to run your own tests to verify it will be better > than the current pool HttpAsyncClient uses. > There is also HikariCP under Apache 2.0. > > Just trying to open options to avoid reinventing the wheel. > That wheel got reinvented 15 years ago and got specifically tailored to HttpClient requirements. So far I have seen no evidence of other wheels being any better. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
