On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 21:28 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2022-05-18 um 17:47 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski:
> > On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 16:26 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > > Am 2022-05-18 um 15:23 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski:
> > > > Hi Michael
> > > > 
> > > > Could you please try the latest 1.8, 11, and 17 JDKs and see if
> > > > the
> > > > issue is consistently reproducible across all versions or is
> > > > specific
> > > > to some.
> > > 
> > > I see the failure consistently on all Java versions:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > 
> > > The server has plenty of resources and is mostly idle. I guess
> > > the
> > > thread per process limit is reached. I don't understand why it
> > > needs
> > > to
> > > scale that high for the test.
> > > 
> > > Do you need a thread dump at the time of the OOM?
> > > 
> > > M
> > > 
> > 
> > Could you please run this test with HttpCore master and let me know
> > if
> > it exhibits the same issue?
> 
> HttpCore5 from master works with 8, 11, 17 except for:

This is very bizarre. 

Could you please try out HttpClient master and 5.1.x branch and see if
they both exhibit the issue?

I relaxed the exception check in order to avoid TLS version mismatch
test failure on FreeBSD.

Oleg

> > [INFO] Running org.apache.hc.core5.testing.nio.TLSIntegrationTest
> > [ERROR] Tests run: 20, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > elapsed: 8.225 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> > org.apache.hc.core5.testing.nio.TLSIntegrationTest
> > [ERROR]
> > org.apache.hc.core5.testing.nio.TLSIntegrationTest.testTLSVersionMi
> > smatch  Time elapsed: 0.317 s  <<< FAILURE!
> > org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: Unexpected type ==> expected:
> > <javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException> but was:
> > <java.io.IOException>
> >         at
> > org.apache.hc.core5.testing.nio.TLSIntegrationTest.testTLSVersionMi
> > smatch(TLSIntegrationTest.java:361)
> > 

...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org

Reply via email to