jcompagner commented on PR #284: URL: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/284#issuecomment-1275998819
i find this comments really strange, so you had some bugs because of the OSGi meta data not fully ok? then i say, now you have a bug, because the current meta data configuration is really not ok. its fully lacking at all. So people cant use it at all currently in an osgi way, if they do (like many people like todo including me) and i find a bug in the OSGi manifest (because i am a user using it) i will file a case with a patch this needs to be changed.. The thing is (and i am personally fine with that) you could also generate it way more relaxed (so in the import and export packages you don't really specify version at all or only start version but not a version range that stops somewhere (that is now and then annoying...) And i think that is really the only more dynamic part that changes now and then when you introduce a new public package or your dependencies really change. The rest are quite static.. The thing is by not providing it at the core you just force that forks are created, now it is just in a P2 repo (Eclipse/Orbit) that managed that, but i guess in the end you get in mvn central also suddenly 2 releases of the same thing.. That is just confusing for people. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
