> On Aug. 14, 2013, 10:14 p.m., Kishore Gopalakrishna wrote:
> > helix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/helix/manager/zk/TestZkBaseDataAccessor.java,
> >  line 91
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/13581/diff/1/?file=341443#file341443line91>
> >
> >     can we have a test case that reads the value along with stat and set 
> > it. why is that we return stat while reading but use int when writing.
> >     
> >     what happens if we read change the access option while writing, for 
> > example convert node from persistent to ephemeral and vice versa. Using 
> > stat should prevent that from happening, can we have a test case for this?

set() uses version# only. passing stat instead of version seems confusing. 
Agree with other changes.


- Zhen


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13581/#review25188
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 14, 2013, 9:52 p.m., Zhen Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/13581/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 9:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for helix, Kanak Biscuitwala, Kishore Gopalakrishna, and Shi 
> Lu.
> 
> 
> Repository: helix-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add support to set data with expect version in BaseDataAccessor
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   helix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/BaseDataAccessor.java 7c65460 
>   
> helix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/manager/zk/ZkBaseDataAccessor.java 
> 77e2b5a 
>   
> helix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/manager/zk/ZkCacheBaseDataAccessor.java
>  869871c 
>   helix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/helix/Mocks.java e30c09b 
>   
> helix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/helix/manager/zk/TestZkBaseDataAccessor.java
>  f97e018 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13581/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zhen Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to