-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14704/#review27110
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


looks good. the validation logic is complicated. maybe we can have a separate 
class for it

- Zhen Zhang


On Oct. 17, 2013, 1:12 a.m., Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14704/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 17, 2013, 1:12 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for helix, Zhen Zhang and Kishore Gopalakrishna.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HELIX-144
> 
> 
> Repository: helix-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> commit 1144384696cb3a0e5acc061380b2c78f1700dcfc
> Author: Kanak Biscuitwala <[email protected]>
> Date:   Wed Oct 16 18:06:58 2013 -0700
> 
>     [HELIX-144] Validate StateModelDefinition before adding it to the cluster
> 
> :100644 100644 025402d... 94e8feb... M        
> helix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/manager/zk/ZKHelixDataAccessor.java
> :100644 100644 7f08b6f... 5300eb2... M        
> helix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/model/StateModelDefinition.java
> :000000 100644 0000000... 2e4d5f0... A        
> helix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/helix/model/TestStateModelValidity.java
> :100644 100644 cb51be9... e9a79d3... M        
> src/site/markdown/tutorial_state.md
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> helix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/manager/zk/ZKHelixDataAccessor.java 
> 025402d 
>   helix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/model/StateModelDefinition.java 
> 7f08b6f 
>   helix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/helix/model/TestStateModelValidity.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/site/markdown/tutorial_state.md cb51be9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14704/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added some new tests to make sure that old models still work and erroneous 
> ones are caught.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kanak Biscuitwala
> 
>

Reply via email to