Vikram, Which branch was the 1.0 branch created from?
Brock On Jan 21, 2015 1:07 PM, "Vikram Dixit K" <vikram.di...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have created branch 1.0 as discussed earlier. All the jiras that have > 0.14 as the fix version should be committed to 1.0 branch instead. The list > of jiras that are being tracked for 1.0 are as follows: > > HIVE-8485 > HIVE-9053 > HIVE-8996. > > Please let me know if you want to include more jiras here. I am working on > generating javadocs for this. I hope to have an RC out once these jiras get > in. > > Regards > Vikram. > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Vaibhav Gumashta < > vgumas...@hortonworks.com > > wrote: > > > Hi Vikram, > > > > I'd like to get this in: HIVE-8890 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8890> [HiveServer2 dynamic > > service discovery: use persistent ephemeral nodes curator recipe]. > > > > Thanks, > > --Vaibhav > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > > > I'd really like to get HIVE-8966 in there, since it breaks streaming > > > ingest. The patch is ready to go, it's just waiting on a review, which > > > Owen has promised to do soon. > > > > > > Alan. > > > > > > Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> > > > January 19, 2015 at 18:53 > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I am going to be creating the branch 1.0 as mentioned earlier, > tomorrow. > > I > > > have the following list of jiras that I want to get committed to the > > branch > > > before creating an RC. > > > > > > HIVE-9112 > > > HIVE-6997 : Delete hive server 1 > > > HIVE-8485 > > > HIVE-9053 > > > > > > Please let me know if you would like me to include any other jiras. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Vikram. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Vikram Dixit K < > vikram.di...@gmail.com> > > > <vikram.di...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thejas Nair <the...@hortonworks.com> > > > January 1, 2015 at 10:23 > > > Yes, 1.0 is a good opportunity to remove some of the deprecated > > > components. The change to remove HiveServer1 is already there in trunk > > > , we should include that. > > > We can also use 1.0 release to clarify the public vs private status of > > > some of the APIs. > > > > > > Thanks for the reminder about the documentation status of 1.0. I will > > > look at some of them. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Lefty Leverenz > > > > > > Lefty Leverenz <leftylever...@gmail.com> > > > December 31, 2014 at 0:12 > > > Oh, now I get it. The 1.0.0 *branch* of Hive. Okay. > > > > > > -- Lefty > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Lefty Leverenz < > > leftylever...@gmail.com> > > > <leftylever...@gmail.com> > > > > > > Lefty Leverenz <leftylever...@gmail.com> > > > December 30, 2014 at 23:43 > > > I thought x.x.# releases were just for fixups, x.#.x could include new > > > features, and #.x.x were major releases that might have some > > > backward-incompatible changes. But I guess we haven't agreed on that. > > > > > > As for documentation, we still have 84 jiras with TODOC14 labels > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC14 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC14 > > > > > > . > > > Not to mention 25 TODOC13 labels > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC13 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC13 > > > > > > , > > > eleven TODOC12 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC12 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC12 > > > > > > , > > > seven TODOC11 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC11 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC11 > > > > > > , > > > and seven TODOC10 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC10 > > > > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC10 > > > > > > . > > > > > > That's 134 doc tasks to finish for a Hive 1.0.0 release -- preferably > by > > > the release date, not after. Because expectations are higher for 1.0.0 > > > releases. > > > > > > > > > -- Lefty > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Vikram Dixit K < > vikram.di...@gmail.com> > > > <vikram.di...@gmail.com> > > > > > > Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> > > > December 30, 2014 at 17:23 > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > Given that there have been a number of fixes that have gone into branch > > > 0.14 in the past 8 weeks, I would like to make a release of 0.14.1 > soon. > > I > > > would like to fix some of the release issues as well this time around. > I > > am > > > thinking of some time around 15th January for getting a RC out. Please > > let > > > me know if you have any concerns. Also, from a previous thread, I would > > > like to make this release the 1.0 branch of hive. The process for > getting > > > jiras into this release is going to be the same as the previous one > viz.: > > > > > > 1. Mark the jira with fix version 0.14.1 and update the status to > > > blocker/critical. > > > 2. If a committer +1s the patch for 0.14.1, it is good to go in. Please > > > mention me in the jira in case you are not sure if the jira should make > > it > > > for 0.14.1. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Vikram. > > > > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or > entity > > > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is > > confidential, > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the > reader > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > > that > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > > immediately > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > > > > > > -- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > > > > > -- > Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work. > -Mark >
