Hi, I should have just waited to check where this branch came from, but I was quite surprised when I received this mail so I too quickly fired off a response. I apologize to everyone for the spam. The reason I was surprised is that I don't feel there was a consenus comming out of the 1.0 discussion: http://s.apache.org/hive-1.0-discuss
As mentioned in that thread, I am not favor of creating 1.0 from 0.14. That will be horribly confusing. Too avoid confusion amongst our users, and indeed our developers, the 1.0 branch should be created from trunk and be a superset of the 0.15 release (minus anything we delete due to depreciation). Additionally, as Bill expressed on that thread, I see defining our public API as a big aspect of moving to a 1.0. Cheers. Brock On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Lefty Leverenz <leftylever...@gmail.com> wrote: > So my initial impression was correct -- instead of calling it release > 0.14.1, we're calling it 1.0.0. Or am I hopelessly confused? > > Will 0.15.0 be 1.1.0? (If so, I'll need to edit a dozen wikidocs.) > > Will release numbers get changed in JIRA issues? Presumably that's not > possible in old comments, so we should document the equivalences > somewhere. A JIRA issue for that with a well-phrased summary could help > future searchers. > > > -- Lefty > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Eugene Koifman <ekoif...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > >> could we include HIVE-9390 & HIVE-9404? This has been committed to trunk. >> They add useful retry logic to support insert/update/delete functionality. >> >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Folks, >> > >> > I have created branch 1.0 as discussed earlier. All the jiras that have >> > 0.14 as the fix version should be committed to 1.0 branch instead. The >> list >> > of jiras that are being tracked for 1.0 are as follows: >> > >> > HIVE-8485 >> > HIVE-9053 >> > HIVE-8996. >> > >> > Please let me know if you want to include more jiras here. I am working >> on >> > generating javadocs for this. I hope to have an RC out once these jiras >> get >> > in. >> > >> > Regards >> > Vikram. >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Vaibhav Gumashta < >> > vgumas...@hortonworks.com >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Vikram, >> > > >> > > I'd like to get this in: HIVE-8890 >> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8890> [HiveServer2 dynamic >> > > service discovery: use persistent ephemeral nodes curator recipe]. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > --Vaibhav >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I'd really like to get HIVE-8966 in there, since it breaks streaming >> > > > ingest. The patch is ready to go, it's just waiting on a review, >> which >> > > > Owen has promised to do soon. >> > > > >> > > > Alan. >> > > > >> > > > Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> > > > January 19, 2015 at 18:53 >> > > > Hi All, >> > > > >> > > > I am going to be creating the branch 1.0 as mentioned earlier, >> > tomorrow. >> > > I >> > > > have the following list of jiras that I want to get committed to the >> > > branch >> > > > before creating an RC. >> > > > >> > > > HIVE-9112 >> > > > HIVE-6997 : Delete hive server 1 >> > > > HIVE-8485 >> > > > HIVE-9053 >> > > > >> > > > Please let me know if you would like me to include any other jiras. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > Vikram. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Vikram Dixit K < >> > vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> > > > <vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Thejas Nair <the...@hortonworks.com> >> > > > January 1, 2015 at 10:23 >> > > > Yes, 1.0 is a good opportunity to remove some of the deprecated >> > > > components. The change to remove HiveServer1 is already there in >> trunk >> > > > , we should include that. >> > > > We can also use 1.0 release to clarify the public vs private status >> of >> > > > some of the APIs. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks for the reminder about the documentation status of 1.0. I will >> > > > look at some of them. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Lefty Leverenz >> > > > >> > > > Lefty Leverenz <leftylever...@gmail.com> >> > > > December 31, 2014 at 0:12 >> > > > Oh, now I get it. The 1.0.0 *branch* of Hive. Okay. >> > > > >> > > > -- Lefty >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Lefty Leverenz < >> > > leftylever...@gmail.com> >> > > > <leftylever...@gmail.com> >> > > > >> > > > Lefty Leverenz <leftylever...@gmail.com> >> > > > December 30, 2014 at 23:43 >> > > > I thought x.x.# releases were just for fixups, x.#.x could include >> new >> > > > features, and #.x.x were major releases that might have some >> > > > backward-incompatible changes. But I guess we haven't agreed on that. >> > > > >> > > > As for documentation, we still have 84 jiras with TODOC14 labels >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC14 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC14 >> > > > >> > > > . >> > > > Not to mention 25 TODOC13 labels >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC13 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC13 >> > > > >> > > > , >> > > > eleven TODOC12 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC12 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC12 >> > > > >> > > > , >> > > > seven TODOC11 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC11 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC11 >> > > > >> > > > , >> > > > and seven TODOC10 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC10 >> > > > >> > > > < >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20TODOC10 >> > > > >> > > > . >> > > > >> > > > That's 134 doc tasks to finish for a Hive 1.0.0 release -- preferably >> > by >> > > > the release date, not after. Because expectations are higher for >> 1.0.0 >> > > > releases. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- Lefty >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Vikram Dixit K < >> > vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> > > > <vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> > > > >> > > > Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> > > > December 30, 2014 at 17:23 >> > > > Hi Folks, >> > > > >> > > > Given that there have been a number of fixes that have gone into >> branch >> > > > 0.14 in the past 8 weeks, I would like to make a release of 0.14.1 >> > soon. >> > > I >> > > > would like to fix some of the release issues as well this time >> around. >> > I >> > > am >> > > > thinking of some time around 15th January for getting a RC out. >> Please >> > > let >> > > > me know if you have any concerns. Also, from a previous thread, I >> would >> > > > like to make this release the 1.0 branch of hive. The process for >> > getting >> > > > jiras into this release is going to be the same as the previous one >> > viz.: >> > > > >> > > > 1. Mark the jira with fix version 0.14.1 and update the status to >> > > > blocker/critical. >> > > > 2. If a committer +1s the patch for 0.14.1, it is good to go in. >> Please >> > > > mention me in the jira in case you are not sure if the jira should >> make >> > > it >> > > > for 0.14.1. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > Vikram. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or >> > entity >> > > > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >> > > confidential, >> > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >> > reader >> > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby >> notified >> > > that >> > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender >> > > immediately >> > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> > > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or >> entity >> > to >> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >> reader >> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >> > that >> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender >> > immediately >> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work. >> > -Mark >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> Eugene >> >> -- >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately >> and delete it from your system. Thank You. >>
