Should 1.3.0 be released at the same time, or even before 2.0.0?

-- Lefty

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The stated plan for 2.0 when we created branch-1 was to be able to release
> more aggressively from master.  As Xuefu points out we've added a lot of
> code and features.  I'm +1 for having a 2.0 release soon, but we should be
> very clear with users that many of the new features are in alpha or beta
> states and that we don't recommend this release for production use.
>
> Alan.
>
> Xuefu Zhang <xzh...@cloudera.com>
> November 10, 2015 at 14:04
> I understand that there have been a lot of things that have been added or
> merged to master. However, I think many of us has no clear picture where
> things are, especially about new features and their stability/usability.
> Thus, I think it would be great if someone can give an high-level overview
> on what we are releasing and the watermark on the quality ladder. This
> should help us decide if it's time...
>
> Thanks,
> Xuefu
>
>
>
> Thejas Nair <thejas.n...@gmail.com>
> November 10, 2015 at 13:46
> +1
> It would be good to let users play with some of the new features and
> give feedback.
>
> Regarding the vote, we don't have a precedent for conducting that for
> a release proposal. So this discussion thread should be sufficient,
> unless someone feels otherwise.
> There will certainly be a vote on the RC.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Sergey Shelukhin
> Sergey Shelukhin <ser...@hortonworks.com>
> November 10, 2015 at 11:58
> Hi.
> I would like to start the discussion about the first Hive 2 release and
> volunteer to be a release manager.
> The branch has existed for a while and has a lot of new exciting features.
>
> If there are no objections, I’ll start a VOTE thread soon. Please mark the
> unfinished features that you’d like to go in, and must-fix bugs via Target
> Version field in the JIRAs; we can cut the branch late next weeks assuming
> the vote passes (by which time the features that are ready to go should
> mostly be in), and work on fixing bugs and making an RC.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to