In my opinion, we should include the standalone Metastore, given: - The Metastore binary/src tarball can be built and provided; - We have been requested for the Metastore tarball and Docker image in the user email or jira. Regarding the package name, the HIVE-20451 has the context, we can just keep them as it is.
Thanks, Zhihua On 2025/06/25 02:07:01 Butao Zhang wrote: > I would like to confirm whether it is necessary to release the standalone > metastore version this time? > > > I locally built the code and found that the standalone hms package is located > at the path [1], and its source code tar is at the path [2]. Am I right? > > > If there is a need to release an HMS version, is there any difference between > it and the regular Hive release? > > > If we are to release the HMS version, do we need to change the package name > to apache-hive-standalone-metastore-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz? I just think > it's a bit strange to include the word "server" in it. Because the previously > released HMS versions did not include the word "server" at all, like[3]. > > > [1] > hive/standalone-metastore/metastore-server/target/apache-hive-standalone-metastore-server-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz > [2] > hive/standalone-metastore/target/apache-hive-standalone-metastore-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz > [3] > https://downloads.apache.org/hive/hive-standalone-metastore-3.0.0/hive-standalone-metastore-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > > > > Thanks, > Butao Zhang > ---- Replied Message ---- > | From | Denys Kuzmenko<dkuzme...@apache.org> | > | Date | 6/25/2025 02:26 | > | To | <dev@hive.apache.org> | > | Subject | Re: [DISCUSS] Hive 4.1.x release | > Would be nice to resolve > https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?impactSeverities=BLOCKER&issueStatuses=OPEN%2CCONFIRMED&id=apache_hive > before the Hive-5.x release >
