Would it be possible/feasible to include 2910? Cheers,
Hugo Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 6 apr. 2012 om 21:18 heeft Ashutosh Chauhan <hashut...@apache.org> het volgende geschreven: > Hi All, > > Seems like we have an agreement. So, unless someone has other ideas, I will > cut the branch for 0.9 on 4/9. Below is the consolidated list which people > have requested for 0.9, so as and when these gets checked-in trunk, we will > merge it back in 0.9. > > 2084 > 2764 > 538 > 2646 > 2777 > 2585 > 2883 > 2926 > > Thanks, > Ashutosh > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 19:02, Thomas Weise <t...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >> Would be great to get HIVE-2646 included. >> >> Thanks, >> Thomas >> >> >> On 4/2/12 6:59 PM, "Ashutosh Chauhan" <hashut...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Here is a list of jiras which I plan to get in 0.9. >>> >>> HIVE-2084 >>> HIVE-2822 >>> HIVE-2764 >>> HIVE-538 >>> >>> I will work with authors of these patches to see these can get in. >> Others, >>> please feel free to add this list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ashutosh >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:39, Carl Steinbach <c...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm +1 on doing an 0.9.0 release, but would also like to suggest that we >>>> put together a list of 0.9.0 blockers before cutting the release >> branch. In >>>> the past we have frequently underestimated the amount of work required >> to >>>> get trunk into a releasable state, with the consequence that we up >> wasting >>>> time doing a lot of backports from trunk to the release branch. It >> would be >>>> great if we could avoid all of that this time around. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Carl >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashut...@apache.org >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between >>>>> then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be >>>> released >>>>> and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling >> for >>>>> 0.9 release. If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for >>>> 0.9 >>>>> later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and >>>> subsequent >>>>> release from it. Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ashutosh >>>>> >>>> >> >>
