I think we plan on doing an 11.1 or just a 12.0. How does shark use hive?
Do you just include hive components from maven or does the project somehow
encorportate our build infrastructure.


On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> considering the absence of the input, I take it that it really doesn't
> matter
> which way the custom artifact will be published. Is it a correct
> impression?
>
> My first choice would be
>     org.apache.hive.hive-common;0.9-shark0.7
>     org.apache.hive.hive-cli;0.9-shark0.7
> artifacts.
> If this meets the objections from the community here, then I'd like to
> proceed
> with
>     org.shark-project.hive-common;0.9.0
>     org.shark-project.hive-cli;0.9.0
>
> Any of the artifacts are better be published at Maven central to make it
> readily available for development community.
>
> Thoughts?
> Regards,
>   Cos
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:08PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > I am trying to help Spark/Shark community (spark-project.org and now
> > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark) with a predicament. Shark -
> that's
> > also known as Hive on Spark - is using some parts of Hive, ie HQL parser,
> > query optimizer, serdes, and codecs.
> >
> > In order to improve some known issues with performance and/or concurrency
> > Shark developers need to apply a couple of patches on top of the stock
> Hive:
> >    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2891
> >    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3772 (just committed to
> trunk)
> > (as per https://github.com/amplab/shark/wiki/Hive-Patches)
> >
> > The issue here is that latest Shark is working on top if Hive 0.9 (Hive
> 0.11
> > work is underway) and having developers to apply the patches and build
> > their own version of the Hive is an extra step that can be avoided.
> >
> > One way to address it is to publish Shark specific versions of Hive
> artifacts
> > that would have all needed patches applied to stock release.  This way
> > downstream projects can simply reference the version org.apache.hive with
> > version 0.9.0-shark-0.7 instead of building Hive locally every time.
> >
> > Perhaps this approach is a little overkill, so perhaps if Hive community
> is
> > willing to consider a maintenance release of Hive 0.9.1 and perhaps
> 0.11.1
> > to include fixes needed by Shark project?
> >
> > I am willing to step up and produce Hive release bits if any of the
> committers
> > here can help with publishing.
> >
> > --
> > Thanks in advance,
> >       Cos
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to