On Monday 27 August 2001 07:10, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > I would. But I have a very good reason. We already have the same
> > basic idea, but done a bit safer. Basically, we have a log_error hook,
> > but it is run at the end of log_error_core, so that we are sure that we
> > always get the error in the error_log, even if we don't get it anyplace
> > else. There are some minor tweaks that should be made to the
> > current hook, because right now it actually sends out too much
> > information, like the timestamp. But, it should handle what George wants
> > just fine.
>
> Heh! Good point! When did that go in?
I added it in 2.0.19.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
