Ryan Bloom wrote: > > I would. But I have a very good reason. We already have the same > basic idea, but done a bit safer. Basically, we have a log_error hook, > but it is run at the end of log_error_core, so that we are sure that we > always get the error in the error_log, even if we don't get it anyplace > else. There are some minor tweaks that should be made to the > current hook, because right now it actually sends out too much > information, like the timestamp. But, it should handle what George wants > just fine. Heh! Good point! When did that go in? Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
- [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread group from co... Ben Laurie
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... Ben Laurie
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... Ben Laurie
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... George Schlossnagle
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... George Schlossnagle
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread ... George Schlossnagle
- Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread grou... Ben Laurie
