On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:58:50PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
> > that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
> > comments are just plain wrong today, so this patch fixes them.
> >
> > (Hmmm, I wonder if it's still like this in worker too...)
>
> Committed, though I did a s/it's/its/g; on it. =-)
And I would have snuck it through if it wasn't for you pesky kids...
> I'd also love to see a patch that looked for -X on the command line and
> exited with an error message to the console saying that -X doesn't exist
> anymore and you should consider using -DONE_PROCESS or -DNO_DETACH...
Lemme see what I can come up with...
-aaron
