"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3) I don't believe that we should be adding every possible module to the core > distribution. I personally think we should leave the core as minimal as > possible, and only add more modules if they implement a part of the HTTP spec. I can't say much, as I'm not a developer of HTTPD, but I tend to share the feeling with Ryan on this. In the light of the latest security warnings on Tomcat, adding a single feature (CGI execution), compromised our entire core... And as Chuck forwarded to the members, it might be worth reading this <http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2792860,00.html>. Adding features to the core, unless they're absolutely 100% safe and 100% needed is, IMVVVVVVVVVVVHO, not a very good idea... Just my 2c Pier (watching the Star Trek marathon on Sky-1)
- [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- patch comments Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2... Greg Stein
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Daniel Veillard
- the rollup issue (was: Re: [PATCH] Add mod_g... Greg Stein
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Graham Leggett
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ian Holsman
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Jerry Baker
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Padwa, Daniel