RE: [PATCH] Potential replacement for find_start_sequence...

[Sander Striker]

> I'm not totally sure I'm sold on this approach being better.  But,
> I'm not sure that it is any worse either.  Don't have time to
> benchmark this right now.  I'm going to throw it to the wolves and 
> see what you think.  

Me neither.  Rabin-Karp introduces a lot of * and %.
I'll try Boyer-Moore with precalced tables for '<!--#' and '--->'.

[...]

Sander