Ryan Bloom wrote:
> It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
> the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
> in the core. Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
> they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?
At the same time it would be nice to get a final release strategy for
mod_ldap, mod_proxy and mod_ssl. It's been on the table for months now
without a conclusion.
I would vote (if I had one) +1 - with the provision that the release
strategy issue is hammered out and resolved soon.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
