From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:42 AM
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> > It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
> > the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
> > in the core. Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
> > they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?
> >
> > BTW, +1 from me.
>
> +0 to remove it from the core. I don't mind having a small ldap blob in
> apr-util, though, and I'm +1 for having an httpd-ldap repository set up to
> house mod_ldap.
Had the mod_ldap proposal been submitted as a discrete message, instead of
being completely entangled in the apr-util discussion, I would have (and am
now voting) +1 to introduce an httpd-ldap sub-project. I would have vetoed
the introduction into our core httpd-2.0 cvs. So I vote +1 to remove it
and introduce the subproject instead.
This was really 'snuck through' - in that there was never a clear
(and seperate) vote to introduce mod_ldap. I'm not irritated by it, but
I'd like to see this made right by and acceptable to the entire group.
Bill
