[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am veto'ing this, for now at least. I will support making mod_gz
> a separate sub-project of httpd, and possibly rolling it into a later
> release of 2.0, but now is not the time to do this.
A separate subproject for something as small as this module sounds a
little extreme. I just checked today - IIS v5.0 supports gzip content
encoding, people out there will be expecting apache to be able to do it
too - without installing anything extra.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Joshua Slive
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jim Jagielski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature