Bill Stoddard wrote:
> I am a strong +1 in favor of making this a subproject and probably rolling it into a
>post
> 2.0 release. The presence of mod_gz in the core now -will- impact folks who are
>working on
> stabilizing the server.
What about putting it in the experimental directory? This way it's
available for the adventurous, but will not impact on the people who are
after stability.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Joshua Slive
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jim Jagielski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Cliff Woolley
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature