Ryan Bloom wrote:
> You missed my point. Your original message said that the first step was to
> release APR. That is incorrect. We do not release APR on this list, and if
> that is our first step, then it is broken. We can either use a previously released
> version of APR, or we can use a timed checkout. APR should always never
> be removing an API, once it is released, so we should be safe however.
Ok - you're right... The whole thing was a suggestion as "first prize" -
APR doesn't have to be separate just yet.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
