Re: Authentication and Authorization

[Graham Leggett]

"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:

> -1 (veto) for 2.0 development.  I'd love to see this happen.
> Not in the current cycle.  I was actually contemplating an entire
> split between the authn/authz storage and methods.  But that can't
> happen in this cycle either if we ever want to get to release.

>From what it seems the focus of v2.0 has shifted from being a pure
development track to a get-it-out-of-the-door track.

Is it not time to start up a v2.1 development track for people to play
around in without affecting the stabilising efforts of people in v2.0?

Regards,
Graham 
-- 
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                "There's a moon
                                        over Bourbon Street
                                                tonight..."

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature