On Tuesday 18 September 2001 04:25 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:05:27AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote:
> > > I'm +1 on creating httpd-rollup, and -0.5 on putting proxy back in.
> >
> > Ok - first question - what do we call the rollup release:
> >
> > o Option A: apache-2.x.x.tar.gz
> >
> > Combines httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util, httpd-proxy and
> > httpd-ldap and produces an apache rollup tree.
> >
> > o Option B: apache-2.x.x.tar.gz, apache-modules-2.x.x.tar.gz
> >
> > Combine httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util into apache-2.x.x.tar.gz,
> > and combine httpd-proxy, httpd-ldap into apache-modules-2.x.x.tar.gz.
> >
> > o Option C: apache-2.x.x.tar.gz, apache-proxy-2.x.x.tar.gz,
> > apache-ldap-2.x.x.tar.gz
> >
> > Combine httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util into apache-2.x.x.tar.gz,
> > and combine httpd-proxy into apache-proxy-2.x.x.tar.gz, and
> > combine httpd-ldap into apache-ldap-2.x.x.tar.gz.> >
> > o Option D: something else...
>
> +1 on Option A. I think that anything else is going to be too
> confusing for end users.
>
> Considering that we do not have a way to build static modules
> outside of the tree without rerunning buildconf, I really
> dislike having separate tarballs (Options B or C).
Sure we do. Try --with-module. There are a few bugs in it, you can
only add a single module right now, but it works, and you can
build static modules into the source without re-running buildconf.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
