On Tuesday 18 September 2001 04:35 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > o Option A: apache-2.x.x.tar.gz
> > >
> > > Combines httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util, httpd-proxy and
> > > httpd-ldap and produces an apache rollup tree.
> >
> > +1 on Option A. I think that anything else is going to be too
> > confusing for end users.
>
> I also prefer option A. My only question is do we really want to start
> making a distinction between "apache" and "httpd"? I don't think we do.
> How about apache-bundle-2.x.x.tar.gz ?
Regardless of how we do the roll-up, nont of our builds should have the
word Apache in them. The httpd project is the httpd project. If we use the
word Apache, then we are co-opting the Foundation's name, instead of
the project name.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
