Ryan Bloom wrote: > On Friday 30 November 2001 03:42 am, Eli Marmor wrote: > >>Chuck Murcko wrote: >> >>>Also if the proxy is dechunking on its client side there will be no CL >>>to send... >>> >>This is obvious. But this is already included in the rule: "there is no >>C-L when a filter that may change the size of the response is onvolved"; >>After all, chunking is only a particular case of a filter... >> >>I think that we should supply a way (for a programmer) to tell Apache >>that a specific filter doesn't change the size of a response. Or doesn't >>change the size of specific reponses (using the contexts of the conf, >>such as DIRECTORY, etc.). Or the hack that Ryan mentioned. Because while >>browsers must support responses without C-L, they depend on it for some >>purposes (e.g. the % of download of a file). >> >>Especially in proxies, where the backend site is not aware that the C-L >>is removed by a proxy in the middle. >> > > The hack is easy to add, and it is safer, I'll try to get to it this weekend if > nobody beats me to it.
I think whats missing is the ability to add a filter on proxied requests. something like ProxyAddOutputFilter/ProxyAddInputFilter > > Ryan > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------- >
