On Friday 30 November 2001 09:55 am, Ian Holsman wrote: > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > On Friday 30 November 2001 03:42 am, Eli Marmor wrote: > >>Chuck Murcko wrote: > >>>Also if the proxy is dechunking on its client side there will be no CL > >>>to send... > >> > >>This is obvious. But this is already included in the rule: "there is no > >>C-L when a filter that may change the size of the response is onvolved"; > >>After all, chunking is only a particular case of a filter... > >> > >>I think that we should supply a way (for a programmer) to tell Apache > >>that a specific filter doesn't change the size of a response. Or doesn't > >>change the size of specific reponses (using the contexts of the conf, > >>such as DIRECTORY, etc.). Or the hack that Ryan mentioned. Because while > >>browsers must support responses without C-L, they depend on it for some > >>purposes (e.g. the % of download of a file). > >> > >>Especially in proxies, where the backend site is not aware that the C-L > >>is removed by a proxy in the middle. > > > > The hack is easy to add, and it is safer, I'll try to get to it this > > weekend if nobody beats me to it. > > I think whats missing is the ability to add a filter on proxied requests. > something like ProxyAddOutputFilter/ProxyAddInputFilter
You can do that with the regular AddOutputFilter command in the <proxy > block. I have done this before. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
