From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:21 AM
> coar 02/02/01 05:21:34 > > Modified: . STATUS > @@ -135,7 +142,7 @@ > on dev@apr: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Vote: Is a non-portable perchild going to hold up a GA release? > - Yes: > + Yes: Ken > No: Aaron, Justin, trawick I have to strongly object to this Ken's assertion. This could be a feature of a minor bump. perchild is certainly a terrific feature. However, we have (in no particular order); * portability and great optimization (for non-unix) via APR * threaded MPM * filters * new modules (many experimental) * better hooks and APIs for module authors. So we will hold up GA for a new feature [perchild]? "But they want it" cannot be the basis for GA. Heck, folks want ASP ... that doesn't mean we drop it all until this feature is offered by someone. Perchild is a great example of what MPMs were designed for!!! But this is _not_ a showstopper to put Apache2.0 in administrators' hands.
