> > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:45:56PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote: > > > > > httpd-2.0.31 does not build on NetWare because of a screwed up > > #ifdef > > > > > APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY in scoreboard.c/ap_reopen_scoreboard(). > The > > fix > > > > > for this has already been checked in but I'm not going to worry > > about it > > > > > for now as long as 2.0.31 is just an alpha. If you are planning > on > > > > > releasing .31 as beta or GA, then the fix definitely needs to be > > > > > included. From here on out, NetWare is good to go! Yeah!! > > > > > > > > We are definately trying to make this a beta. Perhaps Ian can be > > > > pursuaded (with money, food, etc..) to do a reroll, > > > > > > Once the tarball is rolled, that's it, move on to the next version. > > > > > > > +1 (for Apache 2) > > I disagree, strongly. :-) In this case, the tarball was rolled, but it > was rolled incorrectly (my fault for not updating the how_to_release > site). The code was fine, but the tarball needed to be re-rolled. IF > the code needed to be modified greatly, I would agree, but for a simple > re-roll without changing code or tag, we don't need to bump version > numbers. > I agree with you Ryan. What I was not in favor of is making a code change then re-rolling, which is what I think was required for the Netware change.
Bill
