Tony Finch wrote: > > Yes, with the addition that any Port directive is used to create the > canonical name in preference to the port from the Listen directive, i.e. > > ServerName dotat.at > Port 8000 > > is the same as > > ServerName dotat.at:8000
No, that just promulgates the current brokenness. If there was also a Listen 10000 (I assume you omitted an example Listen by accident), your method would result in a dotat.at:8000 even if the request came in on 10000. I feel that if there is *any* ambiguity, the canonicalisation should use the same port that the original request used. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
