On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:01:41PM +0100, Martin Kraemer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:18:26AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > Perhaps we should require the ServerName to have > > a port when there are multiple Listen statements? > > No, that disables the easy (and more useful and intuitive) way of > using the port that the request came in on.
My point is that there are times when the incomming port should not be used as the canonical name. I'm simply suggesting that we may wish to avoid confused users by putting in this protection. > Of course, you *can* override it to one (of several Listen ports) or > even to a completely different one (the one used on the firewall's > outside) by using ServerName xxxxxx:port As long as it can be overridden then I'm ok with this. -aaron
