At 03:53 PM 02/06/2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: >Greg Marr wrote: > > > > I read that last sentence as: "An issue becomes a showstopper when > > it is listed as such in STATUS, and remains one until someone > vetoes > > it, at which time it is no longer a showstopper. ..." > >I think that's bogus, too. If someone thinks something is serious >enough to stop a release, they should be no more overridable than >any other block (read: veto). I find the idea of being able to veto >a showstopper completely ludicrous. :-)
It could be. I wasn't expressing an opinion one way or another, just attempting to interpret the current guidelines. -- Greg Marr [EMAIL PROTECTED] "We thought you were dead." "I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"