At 03:53 PM 02/06/2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>Greg Marr wrote:
> >
> > I read that last sentence as: "An issue becomes a showstopper when
> > it is listed as such in STATUS, and remains one until someone 
> vetoes
> > it, at which time it is no longer a showstopper. ..."
>
>I think that's bogus, too.  If someone thinks something is serious 
>enough to stop a release, they should be no more overridable than 
>any other block (read: veto).  I find the idea of being able to veto 
>a showstopper completely ludicrous. :-)

It could be.  I wasn't expressing an opinion one way or another, just 
attempting to interpret the current guidelines.

-- 
Greg Marr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"

Reply via email to