On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > This patch solves a release showstopper by allowing the support binaries > to be built statically against apr/apr-util/etc. It also adds static > support for the htdbm tool. > > This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since that issue is > not yet decided, but it should solve 7 of the 8 binaries that Ken was > worried about. The "should httpd also be static" discussion can happen > independently of this patch.
Personally, I agree that the httpd *can* be static, but not that it *should* be static. Can we just go ahead and add that while we're at it? IMHO, the real discussion is what is the default. -- justin
