On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:20:51PM -0500, Greg Marr wrote: > Not on Windows. You will not be able to even load the module. The > LoadLibrary call will fail, since the module is linked against > functions that don't exist. That is a standard system error message > from using LoadLibrary to load a DLL when a required dependency > doesn't exist.
In that case we should simply make the error more descriptive: "Failed to load module. Perhaps this module was compiled for Apache 1.3?" -aaron