On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:32:34AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:20:51PM -0500, Greg Marr wrote: > > Not on Windows. You will not be able to even load the module. The > > LoadLibrary call will fail, since the module is linked against > > functions that don't exist. That is a standard system error message > > from using LoadLibrary to load a DLL when a required dependency > > doesn't exist. > > In that case we should simply make the error more descriptive: > > "Failed to load module. Perhaps this module was compiled for Apache 1.3?"
Ugh. Then, +1 for Aaron's comment. (Windows sucks.) -- justin
