On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:43:50PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Cut it out already :-)
I'll try. > Rbb and I chatted about this earlier today. It seems like once the decision > is reached that we have a fast internal redirect, we should _stop_ > processing > that main request. Obviously some well defined return value from the hook > fn, similar to DONE but not quite the same. Ahem, wasn't I saying that? ;-) Yes, I think we need this too. > What would be most cool is to set an r->replace_request member to the > subrequest we will run. Then in the run request phase, look at > replace_request and run the insert_filters/run_handler against that > replacement. That could be goodness. I agree that I'm not sure if it is really that trivial. Perhaps. Well, actually, I know it won't be since some filters do different things when r->main is set. I can see rbb saying, "Those filters are broken." Is that the case? -- justin
