Cliff Woolley wrote: > As a side note, the buckets code is okay because (and it even has a > comment to this effect), it assumes that apr_mmap_delete() will do the > Right Thing, and if the mmap is not owned or already deleted, it will just > be a no-op.
Sorry, I didn't notice before you pointed it out that the code involved left bucket-land. hmmm, I wonder what changed since 2.0.32 to trigger the failure then? Maybe it's some of the internal_fast_redirect stuff, which affects this URL. > Greg, can you try this patch on daedalus for me? Sure, no problem. But it will probably be a while before it goes live. Last time I checked we had 415 active requests, and we've hit 600 (ServerLimit) today. Mondays typically are heavy load days, plus I think we're getting /.ed . Greg
