> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 27 April 2002 04:17
> > > + qi = apr_palloc(pool, sizeof(*qi)); > > > + memset(qi, 0, sizeof(*qi)); > > > > Why not apr_pcalloc? > > I've made a habit of not using calloc. palloc+memset is faster. Huh? apr_pcalloc == apr_palloc + memset. The only extra overhead is the extra function call, since I was asked to reduce code dup and call apr_palloc from apr_pcalloc (formerly, the apr_pcalloc call would do its own allocation). I don't think we should promote apr_palloc + memset when we have apr_pcalloc. If it is too 'slow' for you, you should modify apr_pools.c to be faster ;) > In > this case, when it will only be used once, it doesn't make much of > a difference. Ack. Sander
