> > > It looks like you picked up practically all the changes. Why not just > > > retag 2.0.37? > > I'm +1 for this... > > > You mean, tag HEAD as 2.0.37? > > I didn't want to do that since there were changes I didn't want in there. > > Practically all the changes is just about right ;) > > Well then why are the patches in the tree??? I'm not sure I like the idea of > tagging and then tagging just some files. Seems like if we haven't got a > stable HEAD we shouldn't be tagging. We got into this whole business of > tagging often as a way of avoiding having this sort of thing. Ifw e tagged > and it wasn't stable, who cares. Just retag when it is and move on... > > This seems to be a growing trend and one I think we should stop.
I disagree. I see a lot of value in managing a release by tagging then selectively picking up showstopper fixes. And the RM should make the decision if this is the way he wants to get the release out. Bill > > david > >
