On Mon, 6 May 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > No segfaults on worker un nagoya whatsoever...
Great! Thanks for testing it out. > The only thing "nagging" me is: > [Mon May 06 00:01:15 2002] [warn] child process 18743 still did not exit, > sending a SIGTERM > Not always processes die nicely... Yeah, that's a known nastiness with 2.0.36's worker. At least it shuts down, though. We'll clean it up for 2.0.37. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
