"Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> No segfaults on worker un nagoya whatsoever... > > Great! Thanks for testing it out.
Was about time that we updated HTTPd on there... And Nagoya is the perfect place to test out multi-threaded stuff (6 procs on Solaris 8) >> The only thing "nagging" me is: >> [Mon May 06 00:01:15 2002] [warn] child process 18743 still did not exit, >> sending a SIGTERM >> Not always processes die nicely... > > Yeah, that's a known nastiness with 2.0.36's worker. At least it shuts > down, though. We'll clean it up for 2.0.37. Was also in 2.0.35... It's just a PITA because you have to wait 30 secs before doing a startup if one of the children didn't die... -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick
