On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:44:16PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote: > Yes, the patch was correct (IMHO) and yes, I committed this one. > > About the X-Forwarded-* stuff: It's non-standard anyway (you can add > any X-whatever header and still be RFC2616 compliant) so I'd rather > not see it in 1.3 now (maybe in the next release ;-)
My only reasoning for wanting it in was that it's the way it works in mod_proxy in 2.0. > I've seen proxies like squid hang because of nonstandard headers > (proxy-connection: keep-alive) so I am not very fond of polluting the > header namespace with more non-standard cruft. Not good. -- Thomas Eibner <http://thomas.eibner.dk/> DnsZone <http://dnszone.org/> mod_pointer <http://stderr.net/mod_pointer> <http://photos.eibner.dk/> !(C)<http://copywrong.dk/> <http://apachegallery.dk/> Putting the HEST in .COM <http://www.hestdesign.com/>
