Cliff Woolley wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > Why shouldn't we be including these in our tarballs? They are perfectly > > valid, IMHO. They don't get built automatically, and they give our > > users something to point at if something breaks. (Also extremely > > useful as a source of example code). > > I totally agree. That's why my heart wasn't broken that they were still > in there for 2.0.39. :) >
+1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
