On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 06:48, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > At some point, Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons: > > I submitted 8712 a month or more ago, and have gotten NO feedback at > > all. > > FreeBSD is packaging their version with mod_ssl. We don't include > mod_ssl with 1.3. We have no control over the configuration that > FreeBSD decides to use. I would refer back to the FreeBSD port > maintainer and help them come up with a configuration that isn't > susceptable to this problem. I'm not really sure how we can fix > this problem considering that the ASF has no control over mod_ssl > or FreeBSD's configurations that they use. The ASF distribution > does not contain <IfDefine SSL> in its default configuration. > > As a hint to the FreeBSD maintainer, the idea here is to always > load the mod_ssl library and then conditionally execute the SSL > directives. I do not believe that loading DSOs conditionally is > what we intended with the <IfDefine> construct. This is getting into finger pointing. They pointed me at ASF as you supply APXS.
I'm going to stop here, and ignore the issue. > > > I just submitted 10156 and wonder what it would take to get the patch > > into the next release. > > Have you tried your latest and greatest OS with Apache httpd-2.0 yet? > One of the nice things with 2.0 is that it should easily adapt to > new platforms. Things like this aren't hardcoded anymore. This > makes our job easier. If you aren't using 2.0, why not? After > all, it is our recommended platform. 1.3 is no longer recommended > for general use. The only reason one should stay on 1.3 is because > of third-party modules, and again, we can't magically force other > modules to work with 2.0. Last time I tried, it failed miserably. I'll try again, and I can provide a shell account for ASF use. > > As a note, it would be really helpful if you would attach patches > to the PR rather than inlining them. My web browser does not > display your patch in a nice manner since it is inlined and one big > long unreadable line in Bugzilla. I'll attach it. > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Martin Kutschker wrote: > > It seems the core list members don't use bugzilla. My bug(s) and (only) patch have >not been commented as well. You probably have to send the bug description and the >patch as well to get a response. Additionally try resending the patch. This procedure >is AFAIR recommended on the Apache site. > > A substantial number of the developers spend a lot of time working on > the bug database. The key here is that PRs need to be written well > to help us figure out what the problem is. Poorly-written PRs are > very frustrating to work with - they will usually get ignored. > > The key to remember is that none of us are directly paid to work > on Apache. We're all volunteers here and we try to do the best > that we can. -- justin > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
