On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:03:42AM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> As it's currently implemented, the C-L filter is trying to compute
> the C-L on everything by default.  It only gives up in a few cases:

Of course, in the common case of a static file with no filters, we
already know the content-length (default handler sets it).

IIRC, I've brought up skipping the C-L filter when we already know
the C-L (as defined by r->headers_out), but that was not met with
approval.

Perhaps, we should reconsider this?  -- justin

Reply via email to