On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 08:25:18AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Of course, in the common case of a static file with no filters, we > > already know the content-length (default handler sets it). > > > > IIRC, I've brought up skipping the C-L filter when we already know > > the C-L (as defined by r->headers_out), but that was not met with > > approval. > > Who didn't approve that? I was under the impression that we did skip > the C-L filter if we already had a C-L, and it was the filters > responsibility to remove the C-L if it was changing it.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't know who might have said that. =) -- justin
