On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > > > But not by default. That would be the exception, not the rule. > > The idea is to avoid namespace recursion, and unlike CGIs, most > > folks don't look at PATH_INFO in their SSIs. > > This smacks of a 'father knows best' attitude -- which historically > infuriates me. If it's dynamic, it's dynamic, so give it access > to all its data. *DON'T* force users (and people they ask for help) > into a guessing game about when to turn the option on. > Aye - and people who love fooling netapps/squid/caches who think they should do stupid things when they see a '?' in the URL love using it for constructing dynamic content whith a URL which looks like it is static (and then use PATH_INFO). Dw -- http://www.foo.com/legal/italy/disclaimer.html
