Well, if people are agreeing to this, can we get someone involved in the HTTPD project (non-Covalent affiliated) to review and approve/decline? Volunteers?
-- Jon On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:22:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I didn't mean in the same tree at all! :) > > But, as you said, a subproj under HTTPD > > Jon Travis wrote: > > > > I personally think it belongs as some kind of sub-project to httpd, but > > not in the same tree. > > > > -- Jon > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:43:17PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:02:47AM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > > I would prefer that this became it's own project either under the httpd > > > > > project or the APR project. I don't believe that it should be a part of > > > > > the APR-util library however. > > > > > > > > The functionality provided by el-kabong seems like a good fit within APR. > > > > I think it would be fine if el-kabong became a new subproject of APR. > > > > > > > > > > Personally, I think it's very cool that E-K is being folded into the > > > ASF. I think the httpd project is a better fit however, simply > > > because APR should be protocol ignorant. > > > > > > -- > > > =========================================================================== > > > Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > > > "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order > > > will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson > > > > > -- > =========================================================================== > Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order > will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
